Loading...

The Rolling Stones - Beggars Banquet UK Original MONO Vinyl Rip @ 24/96

Posted By : Euripides | Date : 10 Aug 2011 12:31:02 | Comments : 34 |
|


Rolling Stones - Beggars Banquet MONO

The Rolling Stones - Beggar's Banquet (1968) UK original MONO LP
Vinyl rip @ 24/96 | FLAC | Artwork | 435 MB (+3% Recovery) | Playing time 40:59 min
Rapidshare, Hotfile, Filesonic | Rock, Pop | Released: 1968 | Label: Decca | Catalogue number: LK 4955

Rolling Stones - Beggars Banquet MONO Label A

Rolling Stones - Beggars Banquet MONO

Dynamic Range 10

The last of the Rolling Stone's LPs to be released with a dedicated mono version. The LP was released only in the UK and features a great, different mix of 'Sympathy For The Devil'. The rest of the album is allegedly just a fold-down from the stereo masters but for my ears, it sounds like there is a heavier bass and less guitar throughout and seems more 'solid'. It's great pumping out of big floor-standers :P Certainly the 'Sympathy' mix is very different indeed and it's got a driving rhythm and force that you just don't get with the stereo version. Worth it for that alone I'd say! And just as London and several English towns are being looted by rioters, what better song to retort with but 'Street Fighting Man' which was about genuine revolutionary demonstrations. Right on man.
Euripides August 2011
Tracklisting:
A1 Sympathy For The Devil (6:30)
A2 No Expectations (4:04)
A3 Dear Doctor (3:29)
A4 Parachute Woman (2:25)
A5 Jig-Saw Puzzle (6:21)
B1 Street Fighting Man (3:21)
B2 Prodigal Son (2:59)
B3 Stray Cat Blues (4:42)
B4 Factory Girl (2:13)
B5 Salt Of The Earth (4:55)

Personnel:
Mick Jagger: Lead vocals, harmonica, percussion
Keith Richards: Lead and rhythm guitars, acoustic guitar, backing vocals
Brian Jones: Lead and rhythm guitar
Bill Wyman: Bass
Charlie Watts: Drums and percussion

Recording details:
Recorded at Olympic Studios
Engineers: Eddie, Gene, Glyn Johns
Producer: Jimmy Miller

Vinyl ripping notes and Dynamic Range analysis:
Rolling Stones - Beggar's Banquet MONO (1968)

Media:

Original UK LP 1st pressing, Decca, LK 4955, Matrix A: XARL-8476-1A , Matrix B: XARL-8477-1A
ARTWORK PLEA! Anyone got better scans of this LP?

Equipment:
Vpi HW-17F Record Cleaning Machine
Heybrook TT2 with Origin Live! power supply and DC motor
Rega RB 300 tonearm (Origin Live! mod)
Lyra Helikon M/C Cartridge
Denon PMA 8500 (M/C phono section)
ESI Systems Juli@ A/D
Adobe Audition 3.0

Method:
- Record cleaned on Vpi machine.
- Audio sampled at 96/32 float.
- Filter to roll-off frequencies below 20 HZ (only below audible frequencies).
Audio restoration:
- Manual declick and deglitch.
- Denoising treatments were not necessary.
- All whole sides normalized to 100% NEVER using compression or limiting.
- Fold stereo rip to mono.

Synopsis:
Original pressing in MINT condition - no real problems to report. Enjoy!
Euripides August 2011

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analyzed: The Rolling Stones / Beggar's Banquet (mono)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DR Peak RMS Duration Track
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DR11 -0.91 dB -14.46 dB 6:30 ?-01 Sympathy For The Devil
DR11 -2.05 dB -15.58 dB 4:04 ?-02 No Expectations
DR11 -0.42 dB -13.63 dB 3:29 ?-03 Dear Doctor
DR9 -1.29 dB -12.78 dB 2:25 ?-04 Parachute Woman
DR10 -0.89 dB -13.77 dB 6:21 ?-05 Jig-Saw Puzzle
DR11 -1.16 dB -13.82 dB 3:21 ?-06 Street Fighting Man
DR11 -1.03 dB -14.55 dB 2:59 ?-07 Prodigal Son
DR10 -2.28 dB -14.14 dB 4:42 ?-08 Stray Cat Blues
DR11 -1.85 dB -15.32 dB 2:13 ?-09 Factory Girl
DR10 -1.21 dB -14.18 dB 4:55 ?-10 Salt of the Earth
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Number of tracks: 10
Maximum peak difference (-0.42 dB - -2.28 dB): 1.86 dB

Official DR value (Song Mode): DR10
================================================================================

Downloads:
(Note: 24bit/96Khz FLAC only!)

If you find any dead links, please PM me! Thanks.
No mirrors in your comments, please!

Files are interchangeable! (if you have previously downloaded any segments from my now dead Hotfile or Rapidshare links)

"In sleepy London town there's just no place for a street fighting man"

Filesonic Linklist

Password: eumenides
ADVERTISING » Fast Download « ADVERTISING




Posted By: terra6 Date: 10 Aug 2011 13:24:01
Another great upload & Thanx for FS. Cheers
Posted By: corvonero Date: 10 Aug 2011 13:26:00
Thank you Euripides, much appreciated !!!
Posted By: tubert Date: 10 Aug 2011 13:29:43
Very cool. Thanks!

}---:)
Posted By: altcerf Date: 10 Aug 2011 14:51:36
THE UK Mono finally! Many, many thanks Euripedes!
Posted By: yerbas07 Date: 10 Aug 2011 15:05:15
Madre mía, las veces que he tenido ese vinilo entre mis manos... Muchas gracias, gran euripides, the best.

I'm looking for Let it Bleed MONO first version.
Posted By: luckburz Date: 10 Aug 2011 15:18:15
Many thanks, looking forward to "a great, different mix of 'Sympathy For The Devil'". Cheers!
Posted By: Toby Latimer Date: 10 Aug 2011 15:49:10
Thanks for another great rip , the different mix of 'Sympathy' is a revelation :-)
Posted By: Euripides Date: 10 Aug 2011 15:54:16
Dammit, Hotfile have terminated my account. Sorry there can't be any re-ups for that service. Argh.

@yerbas07: Re: Let It Bleed - mono. You can simply push the 'mono' button on the stereo version because it is just a fold-down from the stereo tapes... nothing different about it. E.
Posted By: ManWhoCan Date: 10 Aug 2011 16:28:22
Thanks E.

Maybe the best LP they ever made.

I have a nice digital but not PS3 (Yet) rip of the SACD of several mixes of Sympathy.
I made a transfer of it to DVD-A.
If wanted, I could up it to RS, if any one wants to post it?
Posted By: PBTHAL VINYL RIPS Date: 10 Aug 2011 19:04:56
Thanks for this...need the Mono "Sympathy For The Devil"..but I don't believe the rest of the album is a dedicated mono mix, someone I respect a great deal prof. stoned posted a breakdown of his findings here >>>

http://www.stevehoffman.tv/forums/showthread.php?t=154854

"Let's try and establish this for once and for all.

Facts: Sympathy for the devil is the only track that has hearable differences w/ the stereo.
It runs in the correct speed (unlike the rest of the mono album minus PS and all the pre-2002 STEREO versions).
The reason this one track cannot be a folddown is because the piano disappears when folded to mono (a result of phase cancellation).

I just did an A/B between the UK mono with the original UK stereo, both played with the mono button ON.
I briefly compared every track. And I could not detect ONE single difference in the mix.

I dare you to come up with notable mixing differences between the two that would prove me wrong. Please!"
Posted By: 0pp0 Date: 10 Aug 2011 23:17:31
Thanks E!


@Pat Dude its like Ozzy typing... whaaat?
Posted By: kwork Date: 11 Aug 2011 01:27:27
Thanks a lot. I do agree that the majority of this album is a fold down, but still. What a punch! It still sounds awesome!
Posted By: jorgeluiz Date: 11 Aug 2011 03:04:04
Maybe the best LP they ever made.
i tend to agree with you, ManWhoCan. ;-)


i had the mono version but...was brazilian??? please RSVP(répondez s`il vous plait)
someone agree or deny? i think that i had the brazilian mono version with same cover a looong time ago but my memory fail now...and always...lol!

Sympathy For The Devil with correct speed in mono. :-)
magnifics basses, i have 2 big posters with the inside covers(*), the 'invitation' white front cover is my preference too.
*(i have a photo where all are in differents positions(keith playing acoustic guitar,others in differents positions too) in the 'banquet'.
i got from a friend that have an old french magazine from long time ago, is 'another' photo that was not used in the album, have magnific colors that seems...errr... 'marijuana effect')

cheers and thank you very much Euripides, cool sound! Big gold medall for you. :-)
Posted By: The Boring Gnomes Date: 11 Aug 2011 09:12:44
Thanks for all your great rips, Euripides...
And since you requested something this time, here's an improved version of the Beggars Banquet cover:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/845/therollingstonesbeggars.jpg/
or:
http://i53.tinypic.com/9ar69k.jpg
Posted By: The Purple Parrot Date: 11 Aug 2011 10:29:08
ooh I just noticed that Lyra was involved in this transfer!!

thanks

@jorgeluiz if you have access to a scanner then I'm sure we'd all love to see the photos you mentioned :D
Posted By: Euripides Date: 11 Aug 2011 11:55:09
@The Boring Gnomes: Thanks for the links - but to be clear, I'm only after images of the original sleeves and labels of the actual stuff I'm posting.
I had a burglary a couple of years ago where all my image files were stolen (and everything else really), though I had all my audio files on DVD data discs which didn't appear to interest the thieves so at least I have the sound (that would have been a near suicide magnitude event!) so I'm posting old rips because they are easily good enough but in a lot of cases I don't have artwork for them so have to scrounge around - but then beggar's can't be choosers! Cheers, E.
Posted By: jorgeluiz Date: 11 Aug 2011 12:22:11
@ all
following 'The Boring Gnomes', here the different BB inside cover in 2 parts, please open the direct links:

http://img59.imageshack.us/img59/2929/stonesbboutpic057.jpg

http://img197.imageshack.us/img197/3625/stonesbboutpicb058.jpg

cheers for all. :-)
Posted By: Euripides Date: 11 Aug 2011 15:40:13
About this 'Mono versus Stereo' mix thing.

differences? I'll give you differences. This should settle it.
1) Micks 'Yow's on the intro are echoed on stereo but have just a little reverb on mono.
2) There are more elements to the 'little yelps' around the 18 second mark in stereo, absent in mono.
3) The general mix of the percussion throughout the mono version is at a higher level.
4) Mono is longer: accounting for the speed error it has about 12 more seconds on the tail-out.
5) Stereo version fades out, mono ending is faded but cuts rather abruptly.
6) The tail-out again: Vocals are 'echoed' on stereo again not reverbed. There are all sorts of yelps and vocal stuff in the background on stereo, not on mono.
7) It sounds more chunky (OK I made that bit up)

There may be more that I missed but that'll do for me. E.
Posted By: jorgeluiz Date: 11 Aug 2011 17:06:47
@ Euripides

BB is one of the best albums ever for me and i heard every day all day long for months when i was young feeling like hipnotised more than thousands times and i still hear.
yesterday i was afraid to wrote the differences that i could hear in the first moment.

YES, you're completely right in your list of differences!!!

in the first 'Yow' i could hear clearly the difference between reverber/echo from Mono to stereo. ;-)
was not needed to play the stereo because this album play in my brain(no need needles..lol), i know every note and detail.
in 60's i buy 3 albums, one after another ...hearing too much was needed to buy another because was played too much and got noises...etc.
BB is part of my good feelings because..had too much 'sweet leaf' and smoke in my brain in 60's, you know.

my curiosity: i always think what is the noise in the high end of 'Prodigal Son',
seems that something fall in the floor...i can't explain...you know what is?

cheers for yours good ears!
Posted By: The Purple Parrot Date: 11 Aug 2011 21:58:43
@jorgeluiz..... thanks very much for the pics

I had a bit of fun joining them together so if anybody would like a copy it's at http://img819.imageshack.us/img819/5755/altbbinnercomplete.jpg

Having now listened to this rip and briefly compared with Kel's fine stereo rip and a stereo SACD version too, to my ears this is a very different listening experience. All these tracks are slower (as mentioned in the SH thread) except for the genuinely mono A1 which is I find to be actually slightly faster than the stereo.

Refering to the SH thread... and particularly to "In order to cut in mono, please replace stereo version of Sympathy For The Devil with mono version at end of reel, and then sum entire album to mono"

If I understand that right then all tracks except A1 are actually the original stereo tracks folded to mono. In that case can someone please explain to my confused brain why those mono tracks (preserved in this rip) are slower (and not uniformly slower either by the way) than they were before they were folded. Thanks.
Posted By: Euripides Date: 12 Aug 2011 10:39:52
Re: speed issues... I can't shed any light on what happened to these tapes exactly but it wasn't all that uncommon for speed errors to creep in. All UK copies of 'On The Beach' by Neil Young were too fast, for example. I think the culprit MAY have been shipping the tapes around and using different tape machines. In theory all machines would be checked for speed accuracy but this would have been WAY before any concept of quartz-lock or similar devices to ensure speed accuracy, and if two machines were only slightly out, one too fast, one too slow, the resulting error would be quite significant. If you check what I say on teh Renaissance 'Novella' rip I put up last month, that bore the scars of two tape machines that didn't have similar tape-path azimuth. Any ideas? E.
Posted By: The Boring Gnomes Date: 12 Aug 2011 10:44:02
@ Euripides: sorry that I couldn't be of any assistance in retrieving your lost pictures (and my deepest sympathies for your loss - who sneaks around stealing pictures/harddrives anyway?)... I do own a vinyl copy of Beggars Banquet though, but not the one in question, sorry...

@ jorgeluiz: thanks for the color pictures, I hadn't seen those before (aren't they a bit too colorful for a Beggars Banquet? - good decision to use only the b/w pictures with some colored faces for the original album art then, wasn't it? - much more in tune with the overall feel of the album, I think...)

@ The Purple Parrot: and thanks for joining them so fabulously...
Posted By: jorgeluiz Date: 12 Aug 2011 11:21:44
@ The Boring Gnomes: a bit colorfull? i like of both. the colorfull is very special as is rare, as i told i have big pictures with both! :-)
me and my fertile imagination: in the original picture with some colored faces the apple is colored too and for me is extremely relevant and deserve deep atention.
don't you think that seems(or was) a joke from Stones to Beatles when Keith with a knife is putting the green apple in the mouth of Mick?
don't remember the 'apple'(Beatles records)? for me...yes, it's a joke!

@ The Purple Parrot: very cool job ...i could not put the entire picture in the scanner and join, i'm a horrible scanner user.lol

@ Euripides: yes, as retired technician i agree and you can be sure: using different tape machines change the speed!
one day i will tell the story of my second brazilian 'white album' LP(Beatles) with full problems in speed...

cheers!
Posted By: The Boring Gnomes Date: 12 Aug 2011 21:02:53
@ jorgeluiz: yes, of course, I like the color version, too (as a matter of fact, I did put it up as my background wallpaper, replacing my usual Billie Holiday one); I just think that the b/w version reflects the album's mood better than the color one... but then again, I also think that the R.S.V.P. plain cover fits the music better than the originally intended toilet graffiti one...
And of course, you're right about the apple and the Beatles connection, that's a pretty obvious one, especially if you take into account that the Beatles released their first full album under the new Apple logo just a few days prior to Beggars Banquet - probably some kind of 'good luck for your future endeavours and don't let anyone bite your apple/take your money' joke...

@ Euripides: I don't know too much about the speed issues, but your explanation sounds quite convincing. I'm not really that detail-obsessed, especially if you only hear a difference when you closely compare one version to the other. To me, most versions of this album are quite wonderful, and this mono vinyl is certainly an extra special treat...

@ all: One more thing for all those interested in different versions or rare finds: the 8 track of "Some Girls" had different mixes/versions of some songs on it and someone was kind enough to uploaded it here: http://www.iorr.org/talk/read.php?2,606044,606044#msg-606044 (the flac versions seem to be down, but the mp3 links are still working)...
Posted By: The Purple Parrot Date: 13 Aug 2011 07:05:34
Thanks for the speed theories folks - very interesting although I'd have expected the speed differences to be a bit more uniform throughout the tracks if that was how it occurred (unless all the tracks were somehow played on different machines twixt stereo to mono fold) but they are all quite different.

Anyway it doesn't really matter lol - as The Boring Gnomes infers, this version is a delight in its individuality.

Thanks again for sharing it with us!!
Posted By: audiophilehi Date: 24 Aug 2011 13:57:25
Great share!!! Thanks so much!!!
Posted By: sutaram Date: 26 Aug 2011 13:13:34
Thnks very much !!!!!
Posted By: CEaston140001 Date: 19 Sep 2011 03:54:23
I'm a little confused. Where exactly do I download this from?
Posted By: johnny cashew Date: 21 Sep 2011 00:12:59
@CEaston, click on the Filesonic Linklist.
Posted By: CEaston140001 Date: 21 Sep 2011 22:30:16
So then I sign up for Filesonic and then I can download it?
Posted By: CEaston140001 Date: 21 Sep 2011 22:59:40
I'm sorry. It seems I just figured it out. Thanks.
Posted By: rroseselavy Date: 11 Oct 2011 18:19:32
Jesus. This sounds amazing! Thanks, Eurip. Eurock.
Posted By: Sunzoom Date: 23 Oct 2011 21:30:17
Amazing stuff, thanks a million Euripides!
Posted By: sachsenpower Date: 13 May 2013 12:14:09
Link is dead.